Working Definitions
Updated: Feb 15, 2019
For The Anti-Racist Educator’s first blog post, it seemed fitting to start off with the importance of establishing working definitions.
Let’s be honest – anti-racism is complicated and messy work. If racism was simple, easy to spot and straight-forward, we would not need anti-racism today. Racism would have been solved with some quick-fix solutions decades ago. But that’s not really the case. Racism is so much more insidious and pervasive that it can’t be solved overnight. There is no single solution to counter racism because it is that complicated.
Race, after all, is a social construct that evolves over time and according to geographical location. To illustrate with a simple example, if I were to use the word “Asian” in the USA or “asiatique” in France, people would assume I am referring to a person of East Asian descent (Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Japanese…). This mostly has to do with the historical migration waves in both those countries caused by imperialism and other factors. There have been more people of East Asian descent migrating to those countries and this results in a racial category accepted by the general public and census documents.

However, if I were to use the same word in the UK, people would assume I am referring to a person of South Asian descent (Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan…). Similarly, this has to do with the waves of South Asian migration coming from countries Britain colonised. In a sense, people of South Asian descent are a “majority” minority in the UK and a “minority” minority in France and the USA. Having grown up in France, my mind tends to naturally gravitate towards ideas of East Asia whenever my British colleagues refer to an “Asian” pupil. So I normally double-check what they mean by that term and I personally use “South Asian” and “East Asian.” In fact, the term “East Asian” has its own issues, as it tends to include people who look like they might come from Indonesia, Singapore, the Philippines, Malaysia – countries in South East Asia – and, even then, the people in those countries are not racially homogenous. Such varied understandings for a single word, “Asian,” are not uncommon in racial matters.
By now, I am sure you can see how much of a minefield racial jargon can be and how misunderstandings can easily develop. If we are striving to be anti-racist educators, to discuss issues and to share ideas – as is the purpose of the platform for The Anti-Racist Educator – it is necessary to establish shared working definitions. Unless a group seeking social justice (be it pupils in a classroom or managers in a school) comes to a shared understanding of key terms, such as “race” and “racism,” it is difficult to be very productive. When key terms are explicitly shared and agreed upon in a group, there is a powerful foundation for knowledge and action.
“Working definition” acknowledges that it is not the only possible definition. Some may find it paralysing when there is no universally accepted definition for a word. Yet, race is so complex that if we shy away for fear of getting the wrong definition, it will be hard to move forward. Working definitions are somewhat like compasses - we can use them to navigate our way round multiple perspectives and to meet each other in more productive spaces. By nature, working definitions are not set in stone; they don’t have to be perfect and they can evolve.

A working definition should not necessarily be the easiest definition. Ideally, it should take into account structures of power and diverse perspectives. Those coming up with working definitions need to be conscious of their own identities and their bias in the drafting process. They should also be open to constructive criticism, ready to adapt working definitions.
With these intentions in mind, we have created a glossary on this platform dedicated to pulling together working definitions. It will be subject to review and it may be edited following valuable discussions and new perspectives being shared. Hopefully, it will ensure that newcomers can gain access to words they might not understand, or might understand differently. It is also a potential educational tool that could be used to develop learning resources for educators and students. As we post more on this platform and discuss new ideas, the glossary will naturally expand – so please do explore it!



SX88 mình mới lướt thử vì thấy bạn bè nhắc hoài, kiểu vào xem cho biết thôi chứ không có thời gian ngồi mò sâu. Cảm giác đầu tiên là giao diện làm khá nhẹ, mở trên điện thoại không bị ì, bấm qua lại mấy mục cũng phản hồi nhanh nên hợp lúc tranh thủ giờ nghỉ. Mình để ý họ tối giản nhiều thứ, đặc biệt mấy thao tác kiểu nạp rút nhìn gọn, ít bước nên đỡ rối cho người mới. Nội dung trên trang cũng chia theo khối rõ ràng, chữ dễ nhìn, không nhồi quá nhiều thứ vào một màn hình nên lướt phát là hiểu bố cục, nhất là cách họ nhóm danh mục…
I was reading through some ongoing comments when https://66pbetlink.com/ was mentioned by a few users, so I opened it briefly to get a general idea of the presentation. I did not spend much time looking through individual sections and only skimmed the interface and overall structure. My initial impression was that the layout looked neat and fairly easy to understand, so I went back to the previous discussion.
https://rr88.com.se/ mình thấy bạn bè nhắc mấy lần nên tiện tay mở thử cho biết thôi. Không có ngồi lâu hay bấm lung tung gì, chủ yếu nhìn qua cách họ làm trang. Cảm giác đầu tiên là giao diện nhìn khá nhẹ mắt, khoảng trắng vừa đủ nên không bị ngợp. Mấy phần thông tin được chia thành từng khối rõ ràng, lướt xuống là biết mình đang ở đoạn nào chứ không kiểu dồn hết vào một cục. Mình cũng thích cái cách họ trình bày dạng cột/bảng gọn gàng, nhìn phát nắm được ý mà không phải căng mắt đọc. Thanh menu đặt chỗ dễ thấy nên chuyển qua lại khá nhanh, không phải mò. Nói chung…
33WIN mình mới lướt thử vì thấy mấy đứa bạn nói suốt, kiểu vào xem giao diện với cách họ viết bài thôi. Cảm giác đầu tiên là trang nhìn khá thoáng, tiêu đề to rõ nên kéo xuống không bị rối mắt, đọc lướt vẫn nắm được ý chính. Mình để ý họ đang đẩy mạnh phần khuyến mãi tháng 8 2026, có nhắc ngân sách thưởng tới 50 tỷ nên nhìn phát là thấy ngay, khỏi phải mò. Mấy đoạn giới thiệu cũng trình bày gọn, kiểu chia khối nội dung nên không bị “tường chữ” khó chịu. Nói chung mình thích cách họ đặt các box thông tin và heading, nhìn một vòng là biết đang nói…
Sometimes I look for interesting information, reviews, or expert commentary because someone drops a link in a group—they are genuinely engaging, but sometimes you read through an article and find such useful links neatly woven right inside the text. For example, I recently came across a great overview on platforms like http://www.politolog.net.ua/ and htpps/deribasovskaya.net